Nicola Bulley Inquest full hearing
26th & 27th June (Preston)
Introduction
It’s incredulous that with a narrative that was always in danger of coming apart early on that they were nevertheless not to be deterred from completing their final ritual, the crowning glory to 23 days of a black Pythonesque police investigation, if we can even still refer to it as an investigation.
Seeing as their stage show has been exposed as the theatre that it was, there’s a chance to head off this unconscionable cult at the pass. An inquest is an inquiry into who has died, when and where the death occurred and, by what means the death occurred. Or so that is what it’s meant to be.
Having understood that Sunday 19th February was a set up, it no longer stands that the inquest represents an independent exercise to help assist the family (and public) to understand what occurred. Au contraire it’s an extension to the ongoing freak show. I explained previously how the photographs of Jason Rothwell were taken the prior afternoon to prepare for Sunday’s parade, nothing more than a carefully orchestrated deceit played out by the press and the police in front of captivated audiences.
It’s a modern tragedy that there remain functional adults to this day that exist in a parallel dimension beholden to their puppeteers, damned to live out the briefest of physical experiences in this shared human realm of existence. The simplest of tests to discern whether an individual still has the capacity to feel or sense divine energy through which to find their true nature and higher self. What do you see?
Back to the inquest, part of the coroner’s role is to be to explain distortion of space-time in relation to both people and objects to account for a final absolute gem that Ivy (aka Unapologetically ME True Crime - on YouTube) will exclusively reveal to you about that Sunday 19th February. No amount of sorcery will be able to make you unsee it. The emperor has no clothes.
Dr James Adeley is a shoo-in for the Criminologist (at 0:53) in this cult classic, but no number of physicists hypothesising about quantum entanglement and time travel will dig him out of this hole. Perhaps a good old-fashioned spade Dr Adeley!
If you’ve come this far it must be assumed you have sufficient awareness of how the medical profession were able to go about falsifying cause of deaths during a fake pandemic, ably supported on an ongoing basis by coroners who are judicial office holders appointed by the Crown. They’ve kept very quiet in more recent months; you don’t hear much from them on the very real epidemic of excess (and sudden, unexpected) deaths – the new normal – but lo and behold mainstream media took centre stage to continue toying with the gullible public.
Dr James Adeley will hold court to present the script given him. Not to downplay his creativity in the process naturally, as he must still use his expertise to provide the necessary content to support the forthcoming recital.
As to why there’s no doubt as to his involvement with the cover-up, he was so good as to show his hand with the circus act on 4th April - widely reported by the media of course - when he requested specialist police divers return to the River Wyre “to assist with the coronial process.” Remember, he’s not a regular member of the public who’s been duped, but rather has the rarefied position of access to direct evidence that it’s been a hideous fraud from day one.
Coroners Court Inquest at County Hall
The inquest has now been extended from a full day hearing to two full days which is meant to impress you. However, this only means twice the pile of steaming bullshit that approved ‘journalists’ will be covering to then ‘write-up’ as part of an excruciating gaslighting extravaganza. The pre-written news agency cock and bull stories that the journalists need only push out will be at the ready. Let’s turn to the important aspects as to how this will be coordinated.
· (1) Control of the environment
There were 70 allocated seats for members of the public - available through an application online process - and 38 allocated seats for accredited members of the press - available by emailing media@lancashire.gov.uk
To ensure tight restriction on the 70 members of the (vetted) public permitted to attend this Act of the show, the online application requires agreement to the following Terms and Conditions for entry to County Hall, Preston for attendance at the Inquest (see link):
I include a few highlights from the above link to the t&c website:
Lancashire County Council (LCC) reserves the right, at its absolute discretion, to refuse admission to any person and/ or eject any person from the building in which the inquest is being heard, if it considers in its discretion that person's behaviour or conduct is causing, or is likely to cause (without limitation), damage, injury, nuisance or distress to others. This does not affect the coroner’s powers of contempt of court.
“The following items are prohibited within the building in which the inquest is being heard: any device capable of recording, capturing or live streaming audio or video (including, but not limited to, recording equipment, mobile phones, google glasses, computers and tablets).”
All prohibited items must be surrendered before, or upon, entry to the Council Offices. Failure to surrender any prohibited items will result in refusal of entry or ejection from the building in which the inquest is being heard.
All prohibited items identified will be stored securely by LCC for the duration of the visit. All items will be returned on exiting the premises.
No filming, recording, live streaming or acts of a similar nature are permitted within the Council Offices or Council Chambers. Any persons to be found doing so will be removed from the LCC building.
It appears that, much like the Precogs from the Minority Report, they seemingly possess the psychic ability to see events in the future and will take steps accordingly😬. 5D chess it is then.
Not only this, it has openly been reported they vetted applications. Imagine my surprise that I was unsuccessful in my application. This is how they worked it. On my application dated 8th June I received the following email acknowledgement:
This is not confirmation that you may attend the inquest.
Thank you for your application to attend the inquest touching upon the death of Nicola Bulley. Your application to attend the inquest has been received and your reference number is CIAA522595181. If you are successful in being allocated a seat, you will receive confirmation by 4 PM on Wednesday, 21 June 2023. Due to the number of applications that are expected to be received, Lancashire County Council cannot write to all the unsuccessful applicants. Consequently, if you do not receive an email confirming seat allocation has been made to you, your application was unsuccessful and, regrettably, you will not be granted access to either County Hall or the Inquest.
Applications closed on Thurs 15th June. Having followed up by phone on Mon 19th June it was confirmed all ‘successful’ (aka vetted) applicants had been notified.
Turning to the chosen members of the accredited press there are naturally no such restrictions and the first question you might ask yourself is who qualifies to be included. They must be ‘professional newsgatherers’ as defined and controlled by the ‘UK’s major media organisations’ and trade unions, and managed via 19 ‘gatekeepers’. I shit you not! Here’s the website link below to help anyone still on the journey, inching their way towards the inescapable insight that their entire belief system and perception of the world is a sham. It’s all a managed simulation based on wicked lies.
Gatekeepers - "a big club and you ain't in it!"
The 19 gatekeepers are listed and include the British Association of Journalists and BBC Press Cards among a fine list of other corrupt establishment organisations.
With the outline of how the inquest will be buttoned down to allow for a scripted performance to run its course smoothly, it’s worth being reminded of how the press, medical profession and coroners joined forces in recent times to falsify causes of death.
However, hold onto the thought that all is not lost. Choose the red pill and you too can become a keymaster and help save the world from the demons that inhabit this realm.🗝 Hollywood really isn’t just mindless entertainment, so use discernement and tread carefully.
• (2) Cause of death
With lashing of pseudoscience, artist impressions, spells and good old-fashioned hypnotic mind control the public were programmed to believe this is what has primarily driven illness and deaths since early-mid 2020. Check out those dramatic looking fake computer-modelled spike glycoprotein bits responsible for all those awful asymptomatic conditions everyone was conditioned to stay vigilant for.
Remember, act like you got it🤦♂️
More recently, April 2023, a bellend from The Telegraph - Deputy Editor of Global Health Security - warned of Arcturus (another computer-generated invention), publishing a magnified life depiction of this nasty little critter to keep milking the charade 🔽. Don’t underestimate the devasting impact this continues to have at a subconcious level to those devoid of divine energy and spirit. Thank you for your contribution Samuel Lovett🤡 - your demonic masters must be pleased.
Tragically, these are just amusing diversions for some of us away from the real action which is the transhumanist agenda ploughing on in the background. A small extract from the latest government policy paper on ‘UK Biological Security State’ published 12th June (full paper link below).
UK Biological 'Security' State
Ladies and gentlemen London-based Google DeepMind, just one of many contributing to mapping and integrating humans into the Sentient World Simulation, initiated by US Joint Forces Command – where human 2.0 exists merely as something akin to an avatar in a computer game. People have been so accommodating offering up their DNA and volunteering to line up for repeated injections to make this possible. It’ll feel real for new entities in an environment that’s far more sophisticated than virtual reality, and this new simulated self in a digital global environment allows for gaming simulations to be run that can predict exactly how people will react to specific situations.
It certainly doesn’t encourage independent choice to stray outside of replicated reality to investigate real dangers in the real world. Relating back to the subject of spike proteins, what we do we know about proteinaceous infectious particles (prions) for example? How does an individual reconcile implications of abnormal folding of specific normal cellular proteins, neurodegenerative disorders with the indoctrinated wisdom of forcibly injecting billions of synthetic mRNA to bypass your body’s natural defenses for synthesis of any given protein throughout all body organs - the brain included? Can BBC Verify👹 can help with this? What could possibly go wrong?
However, I digress, how boring that all is eh? Too many are programmed to spend their ‘quality’ time tuned into episodes of Gogglebox, Love Island or drawn in, hypnotised and brainwashed by the latest scripted horror incident - experiential productions challenging sanity and the ablity to differentiate between the real and the simulated. Stay the course, it’s time to unmask the actual monsters, to stop this trajectory and further descent into digital slavery from which there’s no escape.
All of this preamble is to provide a heads-up that it’ll not present Dr James Adeley (and team) too much of a challenge to spin a foregone conclusion of some form of drowning - an outcome that can be expected to be peppered with ambiguity throughout. For everyone not trapped in their parallel dimension, it does raise the question as to how he can create such content when it’s known that Nicola Bulley never went into the river nor was she ever retrieved from the river, during what was just a show for the masses. Let’s consider this.
• (3) How to fake a conclusion of drowning
Trust this man pictured below? It was Dr James Adeley that contacted Andrew Edwards, who was quoted in reports on Monday 20th February as saying:
“I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities, and more, that positive identification has been made.”
This was from alleged restorative dental work that was ‘on the balance of probabilities, and more’ to be consistent with dental records obtained by the police from Nicola Bulley’s Great Eccleston dental surgery.
To be clear, the above statement is the sole reason to ascertain whether the coroner even carried out a post-mortem on Nicola Bulley, and also the sole reason for assuming it was Nicola Bulley subsequently buried in the churchyard after the funeral service held on 8th March. That is convenient. Perhaps there’s some evidence of her personal effects such as her Fitbit and necklace for example to substantiate the existence of her body? Put this to one side for now.
While Nicola Bulley was categorically never in the river, as indicated in an early blog, it’s possible that her body had been stored somewhere to be later presented as if it had been recovered from a river in which she’s meant to have been the last 23 days to support the fraudulent ‘working hypothesis’ DSI Rebecca Smith tried in vain to defend.
However, there’s a problem with this. What would be the point as this wouldn’t fool a trained pathologist performing a post-mortem. An elaborate hoax is only worthwhile if you can dupe the intended subject(s). The principle of Occam’s razor suggests it be far simpler to have a pawn who’ll play ball due to any one of a number of potential reasons.
Back to the man of the hour - Dr James Adeley - who is in a position to singlehandedly gaslight everyone (the family included). Andrew Edwards, the dental surgeon, obviously doesn’t count as he was handpicked by Dr James Adeley himself!
Consider which is the least bad option between:
fabricating statements and conclusions using information gleaned from the medical examination of another person’s corpse or,
examining the actual corpse of a victim that leaves you with zero plausible deniability about an unlawful death having been carried out, no if or buts?
I can provide source references, but for the moment simply know that a diagnosis of drowning is known to be one of the most difficult tasks for forensic pathologists. Many of the supportive findings in an autopsy are non-specific to drowning and reliability of the diatom test for example is controversial because of false-postive and false-negative results. Therefore, it can only be realistically diagnosed in conjunction with a scene investigation and the exclusion of other causes of deaths. This is where, not to put too fine a point on it, but Dr James Adeley is screwed!
For those of you with the inner spiritual strength to dare contemplate what a coerced individual would be capable of doing, there’s but one remaining question here that I haven’t addressed. A last piece of the jigsaw and then you’ll need to decide. That is, how might it be possible to line up a host of other medical professionals to support an inquest and wax lyrical about the desired potential cause of death of drowning from the information made available to them. It’d first be necessary for there to have been another tragic death, a corpse from which inadvertently there could be a mix up in records, hypothetically speaking.
I finish with but one tragic incident earlier in the year in Blackburn by way of illustration. I tried to look into this poor individual’s background to have the chance to take a moment to pay respects to her but there’s almost no online footprint of this person and so she remains unknown😪. RIP Darcey.
Darcey was certified to have accidentally drowned face down in her bath at home on Sunday 29th January, found by a family member who’d visited during the day noting her front door was unlocked - reported at the time as ‘unusual’. Her death was only reported by Lancashire Telegraph subsequent to the inquest at the end of May. The coroner had established that due to her being a person who suffers from epilepsy she “more than likely had suffered a seizure as she was about to have a bath and fell into the water and drowned”. The cause of her death was diagnosed with the aid of a post-mortem CT scan, the scene itself and exclusion of any sign of other causes of death.
The article to which I’ve referred to above is linked below. Nothing is impossible.
Conclusion
Dr James Adeley is going to have to give the performance of his life! A far better show than the charade of Sunday 19th February.
The main thing to be looking for is what, if any, is the tangible evidence to support there ever having been a post-mortem on Nicola Bulley herself. Then a critical eye must be applied to each of the misleading breadcrumbs that will be thrown down to manipulate the audience. Lest we forget Peter Faulding who can be quoted in televised interview:
“….there’s no way she gone in the river at this point by the bench. It’s too shallow and she wouldn’t have drowned at that point, and she would not have got washed under the weir. And I can say that and I’m happy to do a test at anytime to prove that she couldn’t have gone in at that point…..”
“…I can categorically say from our sonar footage which I’ve since reviewed Nicola was not laying on the river bed….”
The record will not be erased nor modified.
We were all caught unawares on Sunday 19th February, but not this time Dr James Adeley. Brace yourself, you’re going to have less room to manoeuvre that you might have hoped for! As for the media and their immoral, disreputable, underhand minions🔽……..we see you! Your controllers have no power nor influence over us. None whatsoever.