Introduction
It must have been known to the producers at the outset that data from the Fitbit is damning and would have destroyed the entire Establishment narrative in a single stroke if released. You only need to recall how any mention of the Fitbit was suppressed for at least a week, at which point it was buried in an avalanche of misinformation campaigns and scripted distractions.
This is a reason to have persevered in seeking to obtain access to the data using the official channel of freedom of information (F.O.I.) requests. After the inquest in Preston, I was the source that publicised the two most revealing aspects from DC Keith Greenhalgh’s expert witness testimony - in blog posts published 4th July 2023 and 14th July 2023.
Freak shows
Of no surprise, requisite arrangements were facilitated to furnish individuals or small teams directly involved with the Establishment cover-up with pertinent information, be it of the sham inquest or anything else, to assist in performing their respective three-ring circus acts. Freak shows with the accompanying small retinue of anonymous cowards that manage to hold the attention of the dwindling remains of a gullible audience. Not the Fitbit data though, as this cannot be falsified and would be too hot to handle.
F.O.I. request
The initial request made to Lancashire Constabulary on 29th June 2023:-
Under Freedom of Information Act I would like to request the following information:-
A copy of the presentation file itself including all the relevant slides presented relating to the mobile phone & Fitbit
Additionally, the source data file that was summarised in the presentation relating to the Fitbit steps shown in 15-minute intervals between 08:00 and 09:30
Mainstream media and the team of gatekeepers never wanted this level of detail in the public domain. Neither the breakdown of steps, nor information that the Fitbit had recorded a reliable heart rate until 11.48am on Fri 27th Jan 2023.
Mea culpa, in an extraordinary demonstration of confirmation bias it was an oversight to have not pursued this most critical piece of digital evidence. As a consequence, many months of further delay before making the key connection that it was never Nikki Bulley wearing the Fitbit that morning.
With her having driven to the primary school in St. Michaels-on-Wyre from Inskip, in simple terms this precluded her from having worn the Fitbit in question as an example below will show.
While the identity of the individual wearing the Fitbit isn’t known, it’s still my opinion that it was Rupert Fletcher for reasons outlined in the prior post: ‘Game, set, and match : Fri 27th Jan 2023’ published 14th Feb 2024.
Gatekeeper illustration
One of the lead anonymous frauds that has worked hard to deceive people. Biding time before bursting onto the scene after the sham inquest that was presided over by Channel 5 TV star Dr James Adeley in June 2023.
……………………………………………
“Whenever people need a hero we shall supply him”
— Albert Pike [initiated 33rd degree Freemason in New Orleans, 1857. Made Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite (Southern Jurisdiction) USA, 1859]
……………………………………………
(U.S. agent) ‘Mickey’ stepped up to the plate to put on a stellar performance in order to own the Fitbit narrative and therefore control and steer the direction of travel so to avert a crisis.
Yes, fooled for a brief time and we privately messaged each other on Twitter (X) between 4th July and 6th July (2023) on a few aspects. He then published his open letter regards Fitbit research data addressed to Ben Wallace MP and the Independent Office for Police Conduct on 7th July 2023 which was a neat stunt to conceal the nature of the deception that lied beneath. In brief and so as not to repeat what is written in the prior post: ‘Fri 27th January 2023 - She Was Never There’ published 31st Jan 2024, it was all trickery, but all the more skilled when you consider this agent has avoided ever making any assertion about anything at all.
Peter Faulding & Specialist Group International (S.G.I.)
Mickey’s act has only ever been to quash the risk of the inconvenient truth from being revealed, namely it was all staged from the outset and throughout the ‘missing person investigation’ - which included Peter Fraudling’s showboating (6th – 8th February 2023) as neatly arranged by Emma White and Paul Ansell in line with their scripts.
Is it “crystal clear” for you yet, or are you still “baffled” by Peter Fraudling?⬇️This sixty second Youtube short by Blank Faces may help to focus the mind, to understand the manipulative nature of the lead (Establishment) actor.
As the accidental drowning narrative had entirely collapsed with mainstream media no longer able to support the fantasy the scriptwriters offered the audience through 2023, we witnessed the Establishment’s alternative media branch deployed in significant numbers to control the narrative across each social media platform.
It only remains to unmask the mealy-mouthed Peter Fraudling who represents the last leg of the Establishment front, the final distraction and obstacle to the requirement for a public inquiry into the unlawful death of Nikki Bulley.
……………………………………..
Returning to the Fitbit update, information will show how Lancashire Constabulary have sought to deceive other authorities in efforts to prevent release of the Fitbit data in response to the initial F.O.I. request made at the end of June 2023. It’ll demonstrate a wordsmith masterclass which we can all learn from.
However first, to share a real-life example of the legitimacy of Fitbit digital data in the context of being admissible in court as irrefutable evidence to events that have taken place.
The Fitbit Murder
The full article for this example is linked below, authored by Arica Kulm (Director of Digital Forensics Services at Dakota State University). It provides a comprehensive insight into the case for anyone interested beyond the following briefest of overviews.
In this tragic homicide, the husband called 911 a couple of days before Christmas in 2015 reporting that their colonial-style home at the end of a long driveway had been broken into by an intruder, and his wife (Connie Dabate🙏) shot dead.
As part of an unconvincing version of events, he’d arranged to stage the scene so when police arrived he was found partially bound to a folding chair with cable ties on the ground floor of the house, while his wife was found in the far corner of the basement lying dead with bullet wounds to the stomach and head.
As the police investigation progressed it was multiple items of digital timeline that provided a different story to the external impression of a happy couple living a seemingly idyllic life. As a whole, the digital evidence from phones and computer in particular painted a picture of deception and marital strife that ended with Connie’s murder.
Her murder became known as the “Fitbit Murder” due to use of the Fitbit data in helping to solve the crime. Connie would wear a Fitbit One activity tracking device designed to be worn clipped to a waistband or other piece of clothing.
Data recorded includes steps taken, floors climbed, recent activity levels, distance travelled and calories burned. The data resets at midnight, with the data displayed in a user dashboard when it’s synced.
Fitbit data
Connie’s Fitbit indicated she left for her YMCA fitness class around 8:46 a.m., this being when there was a period of inactivity consistent with her driving there. There was activity consistent with having arrived at the YMCA, with the next period of inactivity that began at 9:08 a.m. the time she was recorded leaving the YMCA. Both of these times were also corroborated by camera evidence at the YMCA (where she learnt the class had been cancelled).
The next recorded movement on Connie’s Fitbit was at 9:23 a.m., the same time as the alarm system registered that a door between the garage and the kitchen was opened. Finally, the Fitbit showed that her last movements inside the home at 10:05 a.m. - which was nearly an hour after her husband told detectives she had been killed by a supposed masked intruder!
His story had been that Connie had come into the house and run directly to the basement after encountering the intruder. However, the Fitbit had recorded Connie walking a distance of 1,217 feet during this time, significantly further than the approximate 125 feet between her car and the basement.
The good news is that finally on 10th May 2022 her husband was found guilty of the murder of his wife, tampering with evidence and making false statements. While it took nearly seven years for her murder to be resolved and justice to be served, after the judge had heard from Connie’s family and friends he was sentenced to 65 years which even surpassed what the prosecutors in the case had asked for.
Fitbit update - Lancashire Constabulary (L.C.)
The process has been laborious but that’s the general idea to discourage individuals from being able to obtain transparency.
14th September 2023: L.C. concluded their internal review (to my appeal submitted 21st August 2023 to address the rejection of my original F.O.I. request dated 29th June 2023). L.C. final response:-
“The information / report to which you refer was produced as instructed by the Coroner’s Inquest and not for a policing purpose. As such, the Internal review Panel agrees that the use of the original exemption*** was applied correctly.” [***Section 32(1)(a) - ‘Information contained in Court reports’].
— There followed an appeal to this rejection to the Information Commissioner’s Office (I.C.O.)
31st October 2023: I.C.O. upon making enquiries with L.C. agreed with their decision that entitled them to withhold information based on the above noted exemption, however this was based on the following statement made to I.C.O. by L.C. :-
“Following the subsequent Home Office post-mortem which determined that Ms Bulley had died from drowning, the matter was passed to the coroner’s court and Lancashire Constabulary was asked to stop any investigative work that was being currently undertaken. The Fitbit was in the possession of Lancashire Constabulary’s Digital Media Investigation Unit (‘DMIU’), but no extraction work had been undertaken at this point. On June 16th 2023, the Senior Coroner requested that the Fitbit be examined by Lancashire Constabulary. A PowerPoint was produced in relation to the findings, and this was sent to the Senior Coroner on the June 19th, 2023, prior to the inquest taking place week commencing June 26th, 2023.”
Can you smell it?😂Read the above statement once more, and look how the arrangement of words is crafted to shoehorn a narrative that fits the chosen exemption relied upon to withhold the information. In so doing, they make out Dr. James Adeley as master of puppets with the data to be concealed by virtue of it exclusively required for inclusion as part of the coroner’s court proceedings.
We know better, he’s only the fraudulent TV star who played his role to a tee, having whetted the appetite of gullible audiences with dubious police diver river antics of April 2023 to “assist with the coronial process”.🤡 No matter how hard Establishment frauds try to protect this corrupt public official, the man is now and always will be what he is.
— The next step was an appeal submitted to the First Tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) that saw Chief Constable of L.C. made a party to the appeal.
9th February 2024: the Registrar required L.C. to provide clear responses to several questions, in response to a lengthy submission that outlined the grounds for making the appeal to I.C.O.’s decision noted above. The grounds for appeal started with: “This appeal against the decision notice is on the grounds of deceptive information provided by Lancashire Constabulary (LC) to the Commissioner, on which basis their decision was reached”………. A comprehensive take down explaining the deception of L.C.’s statement followed.
Caught red-handed, L.C. now had little option other than to fess up they lie through their teeth to protect their Establishment handlers (for those that can read between the lines). Incidentally, the judiciary in this particular case remain oblivious to what lies behind this all as the current focus is in the form of an information-gathering exercise.
11th March 2024: L.C. submitted a four-page response to be published another time, perhaps within an appendix including other classic attempts at cover-up on behalf of the Establishment. For example, their official confirmation that they hold no records and had no involvement with staging the helicopter flybys as part of the staged pretend body discovery comes to mind. L.C. are just the monkey, not the organ grinder. Highlights from the four-page response include:-
“Following a review of the response made by Lancashire Constabulary to the Information Commissioner on the 5th October 2023 in relation to the complaint made by the appellant it has been determined that some of the dates provided within the response were incorrect. The response to the Commissioner states that the Coroner instructed the investigation of the Fitbit source data file on the 16th June 2023. This is incorrect as the inquiry opened on the 22nd February 2023 and as such any investigative work from this date was undertaken for the purpose of the inquiry at the direction of the coroner. It is also noted that the date the inquiry was opened was not provided to the Commissioner in Lancashire Constabulary’s response.
To clarify, Lancashire Constabulary was not instructed to investigate the Fitbit data by the Coroner on the 16th June 2023. On the 16th June 2023 the Coroner communicated what findings in relation to the Fitbit he wanted to be presented at the inquiry and on the 19th June 2023 Lancashire Constabulary sent the final presentation of the Fitbit data to the Coroner following his previous direction.
We apologise for any misunderstanding caused in relation to the purpose for which the source data file was held due to the date of the inquiry opening being omitted from Lancashire Constabulary’s response to the Commissioner, and the misrepresentation provided about the direction of the Coroner on the 16th June 2023. It was not the intention of the Constabulary to mislead the applicant, the Information Commissioner, or the Tribunal.”
Yes, it was the sole intention as demonstrated by their volte-face. They know it, I know it, and you know it.
It’s not the end of the story. While clinging to their original exemption which is null and void, L.C. have introduced two further creative use of exemptions that need not be covered at this time. The reasoning provided by way of a response to their new version of events to emphasise that Section 32(1)(a) is not a valid exemption is the following:-
“The Coroner opened the inquest on 22nd February but the same Coroner would have been compelled to suspend the process and adjourn the inquest had the digital evidence recovered provided a reason for Lancashire Constabulary to open a criminal investigation for example. The Constabulary carried out policing due diligence to assess no third-party involvement. The coronial process was able to continue, the inquest taking place some four months later in June.”
It may be hard to imagine needing to keep up the pretence as if a single aspect of any of the investigation was legit, but in my opinion this legal process continues to be best pursued within the strict confines of seeking to obtain the data. A public inquiry is for another day.
So, while waiting for all this to conclude, some other revelations to share.
Additional Fitbit info - L.C. quotes
“The day she went missing the phone was found on a bench and was retrieved by Lancashire Constabulary who reviewed the data from the Fitbit App. The information available via the Fitbit App was data that had been synced from Nicola’s Fitbit. The synced information available was up until the 26th Jan 2023. Nicola went missing on the morning of 27th Jan 2023. Lancashire Constabulary, therefore, had access to the synced Fitbit Data from the Fitbit App on the 27th January 2023.”
“The device was passed to Lancashire Constabulary’s Digital Media Investigation Unit (DMIU) on the 23rd of February 2023 and examination of the device began on the 24th February 2023…….The full download was completed on 27th February 2023. Lancashire Constabulary therefore had access to the Fitbit source data file from the 27th February 2023.”
Memorably, there wasn’t a whisper about the Fitbit for at least a week, until 3rd Feb 2023 (and even then it formed just one of countless scripted media distractions to keep the public intrigued and confused). Emma White as ever in front of the cameras communicated the Fitbit not having been synched since Tuesday (which Tuesday??🧐), before setting up a £100k GoFundMe that was just as quickly withdrawn and also playing host at Marsh Farm Hall ahead of the Specialist Group International stage show.
Nikki Bulley - what happened to her?
There are signs that suggest some playing their part in this macabre role-playing theatre in front of the cameras (the stage actors, not producers) sensed that Nikki was already deceased by the early days of February.
To re-emphasise, in my opinion none of friends and family (nor police officers for that matter) had any part in staging the final production which relied upon another set of actors to carry it off. This is where those that operate in the shadows come into their own, in addition to hired help who undertook a designated role before returning to their day jobs.
No different to the biggest productions on the world stage: lockdowns, face diapers, standing on specially-marked spots, following one-way arrows, willingness to self-isolate for days (either phone-based technology in China, or little white plastic gimmicks and convenient drive-thrus in the UK), eagerness to voluntarily submit to invasive procedures of absolutely anything that’s directed, and much more.
All those involved in and around St. Michaels-on-Wyre continue to follow along in a trance-like state just as so many are compelled to do on the world stage. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose (e.g. some things never change, even if time and people do).
In the last audio I said I’d share an opinion on what I believe to be a strong possibility as to what happened to Nikki. This is the first time as it remains important not to publish purely speculative ideas, but rather ideas that can be supported with a transparent rationale. The relatively few depraved individuals responsible represent the sickest in society no ifs, and, or buts about it.
This necessarily begs the question and leads to the challenge of who has outed themselves to have been involved in the set-up from the get-go. Forget Jason Rothwell, but a pawn and stage actor, as though he played a lead role it’s still a conundrum around whether he has full control of his mental faculties which would take us on a journey back into how the Establishment has perfected the war on the mind over a period of decades.
While anonymous ringleaders within controlling entities include the likes of Danbers Ecitsuj, there’s only so much involvement (and detailed knowledge) that partners in the U.S. could have. By her own admission and futile attempts to continue to misdirect, statements on virtually driving from Inskip to St. Michaels-on-Wyre are idiotic and reveal being at arms length based on geography.
British ringleader counterpart
Time to reintroduce this exceptionally unpleasant and anonymous coordinator who in my opinion has indicated having depth of knowledge surrounding Nikki’s fate. To anyone familiar with Youtube, this deceiver goes by the persona of MBACT volunteer56 (a colleague of Fortean23 who has been mentioned in earlier posts). They are quite a double act and routinely support fraudulent Youtube channels, posing as innocent third-party members of the public.
Below is a reply made on social media to Jason Rothwell (and ‘Mickey’ surprise surprise). It must be exhausting and quite the challenge to keep track of all the lies and contradictions. It’s careless to have forgotten that J.R.’s identity only became (intentionally) known as part of the unfolding scripted performance when the media were able to determine who he was from the unforgettable staged scenes filmed by the Establishment man of the hour, Curtis Media.
Imagine my surprise to find the reply by MVolunteer@76 to have since been deleted in the last few days. Too fucking late! Mid-February? Ah yes, a small team very much in the know.
Everything’s in plain sight and the sickest of these frauds will mock the public by revealing truths, all part of masonic theatre. This aged fraud is past his retirement age and been around too long, finally now adding a ridiculous Twitter (X) profile picture after being mocked in the last blog post. 👏Congratulations, that’s sure to now fool anyone with a brain cell. 🤦♂️
There’s nothing that I need add to the words. Their words. It’s all a game to them. Do not try and understand it from a rational-world paradigm as their belief system mirrors much of what we can observe around us today. However, darkness can only prevail in the absence of light.
Wrap Up
As fast as the truth continues to be revealed, scriptwriters scramble to invent more fabrications and deceptions to support the repetitive nature of all their lies from the outset. A one-trick pony entirely reliant on the principle that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.
The earlier post: ‘Establishment whitewash - choice of method’ published 20th Dec 2023 outlined the route that the Peter Fraudling grift is geared towards. Reliant on side-stepping the judicial system of the state and navigating to a route via the Home Office (a ministerial department of the British Government).
The home secretary and head of the Home Office since November 2023 is the politician Rt Hon James Cleverly MP.
The Director General of the National Crime Agency is Graeme Biggar - reports to James Cleverly MP.
The Director General of the Security Service (MI5) is Ken McCallum that produce an annual report on their ‘work’ to both James Cleverly MP and Prime Minister.
The Home Office is responsible for policing in England and Wales and the 43 Home Office funded territorial police forces are each assigned to one of four geographic regions overseen by His Majesty’s Inspectors of Constabulary.
Facts, evidence and laws of the country may continue to prove a considerable inconvenience, but it increasingly appears that it may be the UK constitution that’ll have the last word. Worth sticking around for.
Thanks for reading. 🙏