Justice for Nicola Bulley - part two
Feb 19th
INTRODUCTION
In part one I explained the facts that exist, highlighted the most important inconsistencies with the timeline and demonstrated that the eyewitness accounts are fictitious. The cock and bull story that Lancashire Constabulary desperately continue to grasp at is a farce, a house of cards ready to collapse.
At the end of this shocking revelation of what happened on Feb 19th I’ll conclude by revealing the only organisation that can be behind it all given the totality of what we know. I hope you have your previous answer to the (hypothetical) question I raised in part one at hand so that we can compare notes.
Before looking at the facts of Feb 19th I’ll address three areas that I consider have a bearing to help with overall understanding:
(1) Two relevant updates to part one for completeness.
(2) Reluctantly, to consider the WHY rather than the WHO regarding Nicola’s murder. I’ll only provide some facts that are suggestive of a reason and meet the threshold for disclosure for consideration.
(3) From some pushback I’ve received for seeking to reveal the fiercely guarded truth, to revisit ‘background misinformation’ and to describe what it is and how to spot it.
PART ONE (Jan 27th - Feb 18th ): Updates
Additional material that supports what we already know from part one (the investigation):
(i) Fictional eyewitness account timeline 1 (9.15am): it was reported and quoted that it was allegedly two people: “they say she was laughing and joking with them as she went by.”
Daily Record: phony witnesses 9.15am timeline 1
(ii) Reported by the Mirror the day after the discovery of Nicola’s body on Feb-20th
Mirror: “Jan 31st – Lancashire Constabulary spoke with a potential witness, a man who had been walking a small white fluffy dog near the River Wyre at the time of Ms Bulley’s disappearance. He is understood to have lived locally and been a regular on the route but had NOT SEEN Nicola on the day she vanished.”
Mirror: fake witness sighting upper fields
I explained why the first falsified timeline had to be reinvented a week into the investigation, but hadn’t mentioned the phony eyewitness statement was claimed to be of two people who “laughed and joked” with Nicola. The police fell for it understandably. What better way than to have two phony witnesses throw the police off track.
I explained the backstory as to how the reported Keith (white fluffy dog) Barlow’s last sighting was dreamed up and never happened. I hadn’t spotted - and evidently neither have they - that the Mirror reported on the initial police contact with Keith on Jan 31st after the appeal, him saying he’d not seen Nicola. This means Hilary Barlow (the individual caught out lying) and DSI Rebecca Smith (the SIO) have more than a few unanswered questions here!
WHY NICOLA BULLEY?
I’ve somewhat reluctantly decided to list the following facts that merit further attention, as if you’ve stuck with me this far, congratulations you probably make up part of a rarefied group that are not hopelessly brainwashed and still have the capacity for critical thinking, able to weigh up up information pragmatically.
With considerable prior experience in transportation and logistics I see red flags with Express Freight Services Limited, a company of twenty years solely owned and operated by Nicola’s parents, with negligible net worth.
Set up in 2001 in Essex, listing an unusual Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code of 74909 [other professional, scientific and technical activities not elsewhere classified] - not freight/transport?! - the Bulleys relocated to the Blackpool area in 2007. The company, exclusively run by the Bulleys was most recently re-registered at a service address of a Chartered Accountancy firm at Seneca House, Blackpool during April 2014. With a website that a five-year-old could create, no marketing footprint at all, references of ‘Royal Haulage’ (it’s Road Haulage Association), the tacky image of an arctic with fake livery, no Operators licence, not a member of British Intl. Freight Association (BIFA), insignificance asset worth…..it’s hard to envisage for whom and what purpose this business is really run. When you take a close look it’s almost too poor an imitation of a front organisation.
To use a biblical quote Numbers 14:18 (King James Bible),
“The Lord is longsuffering, and of great mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression, and by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation.”
I’m not making an accusation, but I am pointing toward a legitimate area of concern for review if justice is to be served. It’s not unreasonable to consider that the reason that (innocent) Nicola was murdered could be known to others, but that it can’t be disclosed no matter the genuine grief being felt with her loss. After all there is something, as yet unknown, but huge behind all of this.
BACKGROUND MISINFORMATION - revisited
Controlled opposition, bots and trolls are ubiquitous and ruthlessly efficient at wrongfooting most people, distorting their perceptions to distract them from discovering what really goes on.
Mark Twain: “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.”
I can admit to having been fooled by controlled opposition, it happens. Be open to it, nothing to be embarrassed about, otherwise you’ll continue to be hoodwinked by the narratives designed to lead you astray.
Previously in part one I provided an example of disingenuous Youtubers subject to the hidden influence of others spreading unfounded rumours using trickery and sleight of hand. What I’ll share below is applicable to everything, so I hope it can come in useful whenever seeking to look for the truth about something.
Vladimir Lenin is attributed with the quote: “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
This approach has been a mainstay of society for a long time and if interested I encourage research into Operation Mockingbird for example. This was a covert US government operation run by the CIA started in the 1950s, to implant propaganda in the media and key organisations. People in the media were hired to write false stories or embellish stories to suit the agendas. Do your own research and don’t for a second think that this hasn’t been much refined since then and widely adopted in the British press.
You need only recognise that the unembellished truth is the one thing that the general public must never learn and it logically follows from there that a great many narratives and counter-narratives are created to divert the public away from it. They serve to both conceal the truth and to enable hidden agendas to be realised.
I hesitated before using this example but here goes anyway, as this impacted the life of every single person without exception and it can act as the perfect litmus test should you need it as to whether you remain in a state of denial. Anyone that clings to the belief the 23 March 2020 lockdown and everything that unfolded since can be traced back and is the consequence of a ‘novel virus’ that either leaked accidentally or was intentionally released from a lab in Wuhan, China, is living in cloud cuckoo land. There are plenty of well-crafted variations of a theme all sneakily managed via mainstream media (surprise, surprise) during the last three years, as and when the timing was right to continue deflecting away from the truth. I leave you with a clue as to what purpose the fake narratives all serve from none other than my favourite clown, not Bozo the Clown but President Biden. Is he subtle? I don’t think so. All a bit obvious when you get it.
Moving swiftly on and getting back to a commitment to seek justice for Nicola Bulley, it’s necessary to continue shining the spotlight on anyone complicit to eke out much needed answers to uncover what’s being concealed.
Nicola Bulley key false narratives
The main key narratives people have been persuaded to beLIEve in (all lies) throughout the investigation:
(1) A tragic incident where Nicola either jumped or fell into the river:
This is the primary fiction mainstream media worked tirelessly on, herding entire flocks of sheep into their respective sheep pen. It doesn’t matter whether the sheep were herded into a tragic accident pen, or a suicide pen, mission has been accomplished. Psyops and the other counter-narratives flooding the internet are all designed to round up those that couldn’t be herded:
(2) Foul play in Nicola’s disappearance with the main suspects either her family & friends, or the dogwalkers who discovered Willow and subsequently raised the alarm:
Either version works just fine with efforts made to focus attention on frivolous and ambiguous titbits of information planted on social media for this very purpose. Image stills, selected clips from TV recordings, ambiguity around events reported, lookie-likies, Lancashire police incompetence and deployment of trolls and bots are all part of reinforcing this notion of the above persons having played a nefarious role in the disappearance of Nicola. Finally:
(3) The whole thing is a psyops, the entire situation is false, a hoax staged around a fictional character of Nicola Bulley that doesn’t exist in real life:
It’s easier than you might imagine to be swept along with this theory, but before laughing to hard, in the defence of people who genuinely believe this (as opposed to the sick grifters manipulating their perceptions), consider why these people could believe it.
With Nicola obviously never in the river, it’s implausible to see how normal individuals could stage Nicola vanishing into thin air, all the while not being discovered in one of the most high profile cases of recent times. Their brains are engaged so far, and now all that’s needed is a convincing illusion to make out Nicola Bulley isn’t a real person to lead this group down a rabbit hole from which there’s no escape. This audience probably watch too much Alex Jones & Infowars – an infamous ‘conspiracy theorist’ who’s a leading figure amongst Controlled opposition*.
*Controlled opposition: in this context, for those not familiar, I refer to anyone who predominantly speaks the truth about many events but is in fact part of a much bigger scheme to manipulate audiences in accordance with the wishes of their respective handlers.
I’ve admitted I’ve often been fooled and I don’t claim to always know who’s genuine but misguided versus who’s controlled opposition. I don’t much care as it makes little difference, just try not to get distracted by them. I’ll give just two examples how this idiotic theory was promoted and gained traction because it’s important to understand what I’m describing here.
(a) With several thousand followers this person posts on Twitter four pictures of Nicola and makes the wild statement based off nothing at all that they must be of a fictional digital identity. Someone who’s not strong on using facts to make an assertion. In my opinion this profile belongs to a genuine, but misguided individual making 2 + 2 = 5. However, he or she has been truly captured by the disinformation campaign to doubt Nicola’s very existence and needs to learn a serious lesson from this.
Promoting false narrative (3) - fictional digital identity
(b) Turning to a freelance journalist and filmmaker with a sizeable following, Jacqui Deevoy has been highly effective in drawing attention away from the truth, relentless in her approach and consistent by not having the slightest foundation for her claims that Nicola isn’t real.
Journalist promoting false narrative (3)
She posted an additional article a few days after Nicola’s body was discovered doubling down and listing some of the most stupid questions imaginable to anyone that’s paid the slightest attention. The initial article linked above is quite a feat, managing to paint herself as the victim! Other important telltale signs you can always look out for as a great example of duplicity is evasiveness. When provided with facts and clear information the pattern is exactly the same. To simply ignore facts presented, be evasive, and then rehash the same nonsense through a cycle of rinse and repeat. Her effectiveness is twofold, using repetition she successfully sucks many into the fantasy while at the same time driving those that are horrified by her total absence of empathy for Nicola’s grieving family and friends right back to the comforting lie of the river narrative. Don’t expect controlled opposition to rate highly on integrity as it doesn’t come with the job description.
Do also be aware of the shills that try to focus your attention on minutiae as if it has any relevance whatsoever. They can’t articulate what the minutiae in question means or how it forms part of a coherent whole, but they will grasp and hold your attention. It’s time to move onto Lancashire Police’s performance of Sunday Feb 19th.
EVENTS Feb 19th (discovery of Nicola’s body)
Lancashire Police and mainstream media performed a remarkable double act that could readily be mistaken for a Netflix production.
FACT ONE: less than 60 minutes after an initial call was placed to the police at 11.36am, mainstream media had flooded the internet with extensive coverage including many photos of the events unfolding in real time. First reported as the discovery of a body by two dogwalkers at a remote location just off Rawcliffe Road, about a kilometre downstream of the river from St Michaels on Wyre. I’ll show that the timing points to foreknowledge, and foreknowledge means a set up.
Within the frenzy of early media reports a local witness outlines the following to a journalist:
Witness: “I pulled off at about 11.50am and I heard the man talking to police about something in the undergrowth. Police cars were flying down the road with the blues and twos going. A police officer pulled up a few minutes later and got his drone out. Five minutes later the police helicopter arrived. Officers then asked to me get out so I moved 200 yards down the road. I could still clearly see the man pointing at the riverbank. Then more police cars raced down with the blues and twos going. They cleared the entire road.”
The call placed into the police centre at 11.36am had to have been expected, a green light to send out the troops, with freelance photographers already in situ to document proceedings. You simply can’t cheat time!
The police response involved local police officers, police helicopter, specialist underwater search teams and of course DSI Rebecca Smith some time later onto the scene to complete the picture. Media reporting continued throughout Sunday including the recovery of a body a little after 2pm after divers searched the area (the body of which, the next day, was identified to be Nicola from dental records).
At the outset it was clear the media were making it up as they went along and that nothing was as it seemed. The abridged version to the obvious flaws in the reports were that there’s no footpath at the relevant location, no dog in any of the media photos and the body was evidently concealed from sight in the reeds as made clear from specialist divers deployed to search the relevant area.
FACT TWO: There was no crime scene established, no forensic team, nothing sealed off, diddly-squat! Just the country road blocked off to prevent too many prying eyes, time to find and recover the body presumed to be Nicola’s before all disappearing with the area reopened to the public . Does this sound at all familiar? Think back to the early days of Nicola’s disappearance. The whole event now playing out just the enactment of the finale to a muddled, bogus investigation.
FACT THREE: The reported ‘dogwalker’ later confirmed he’d been asked by the police to clamber down the steep bank to point out where he suspected the body might be found for the benefit of the circling police helicopter’s camera overhead (see below).
If you were watching a crime film on the television you’d have switched it off by now for the desperate lack of realism and absurdity. Not really measuring up to ‘Silent Witness’ at any level. What was the conversation riverside, maybe something like: “Of course, sure bud, we’re here now, the chopper’s circling, you just go scramble down and point to where your gut’s telling you a body is. Make sure you assume a pose as the photographer is across the river poised all ready.”
FACT FOUR: It was Chris Neill (a freelance photographer) who took the best (staged) photos circulated in many of the mainstream media stories without which the journalists wouldn’t have been able to so easily positively identity the man of the hour. Chris isn’t local, lives about an hour away, but to quote his own words….: “sheer luck”.
I politely contacted him on twitter (@theeal) Feb 21st but was immediately blocked. Run but you can’t hide! The paparazzi have no qualms of posting pictures of other people so it’s ironic that he now finds himself a star material witness to the staged events.
Question: who tipped you off Chris to be in the right place at the right time? That’s all we need the answer to.
While he’s unlikely to be the only photographer in the know, much like journalist Isla Traquair from part one, Chris Neill is the one standing out like a sore thumb caught with his pants down on this occasion with no wriggle room to explain a credible timeline for his being in a prime position for the day’s performance.
FACT FIVE: The key photos are taken from both sides of the river, with the very earliest snaps from the far side as soon as first police responders are on scene. Here’s a map of the location, this makes clear the implications of this - no nearby bridges. Super shots though!
This is when the story gets interesting, in seeking to bring this dystopian fairy-tale to its conclusion. With most successfully tricked into believing the mystery of Nicola’s disappearance to be over, brainwashing complete, the media start to rewrite the account of what just unfolded. In a familiar turn of events much like the scam of changing timelines during the investigation, a new absurd version of this ‘discovery’ unfolds. Ladies and gentlemen - the writer and director, encouraged by the astonishing level of deception they’ve got away with so far, may have decided it could be fun to mercilessly mock the gullible general public.
FACT SIX: courtesy of the published photos (and a video I’ll come to later), journalists were able to later positively identify the individual as Jason Rothwell who’d made the ‘discovery’ and call into the police at 11.36am. Jason wasn’t a dogwalker but just your everyday psychic medium who felt the compulsion to drive fifty miles from his home in Oldham that very morning to a remote location along a country road, leading to the very place where Nicola’s body could be found. Apparently missing persons is his thing! Okey-dokey! Remember he couldn’t even see the body at this stage – just a eureka moment!
Now’s the moment to give your head a wobble if this got pass you. Can you imagine the phone call into the police leading to deployment of resources including helicopter. Off the back of a hunch! Really try to visualise it. It can’t have been a long call either based on the slick near instantaneous response.
Question: will Lancashire Constabulary be releasing the audio of this phone call under FOI request? And pigs might fly.
FACT SIX: Jason Rothwell never gave any interview to the media neither beforehand nor upon them having discovered his identity. I’m confident this remains the case at the time of writing. Journalists had to be satisfied with repeating a statement that he posted to his Facebook profile Feb-20th
Psychic's Jason Rothwell's statement: Feb 20th
While I’ve added the link to show the statement, it was edited from the original statement posted some four hours earlier at 3.15pm on Feb-20th . I show this in full below as I believe the reason for the change was the indiscretion of naming Michael Brooks (another tragic case in Lancashire no less where the unfortunate young man’s body was recovered from a river twenty-three days after his disappearance five years earlier). It’s not the right time to expand on this now, nor on the extent of Jason Rothwell’s involvement, but I hope if meaningful progress can be made in seeking justice for Nicola Bulley, then there’s also the chance to cast the net wider with a discerning eye over potentially related, unexplained cases.
Jason Rothwell: “It is with great regret that I have to address this issue at this time. But due to wide number of private enquires and threads now circulating on YouTube and TikTok, I feel I should but put a brief statement. As has obviously become apparent, yes it is myself in the images in the media currently circulating relating to the case of Nicola Bulley and yes yesterday morning it was myself and a friend who reported and assisted the police in the recovery of a body from the river Weir. Such as it is it would be inappropriate of me to discuss in any further detail anything we may know about that body at this time, considering a formal identification of that body has yet to be confirmed. I would also like to just say a huge thank you to Lancashire police for their help, support and the open mindedness with which they dealt with us, following our call, spiritualists or mediums are obviously not something the police come across every day and I appreciate the respect given to us both. It is also important to mention, I was not asked by the police or Nicola’s family to become involved in this case, but having seen the wild speculation and hurtful commentary that has been ongoing, and having previously assisted in the recovery of Michael Brooks, I decided to use whatever “gift” it is we mediums possess to try and locate Nicola Bulley. I Would however stress again, I can not confirm that body we traced yesterday is that off the lady in question. My thoughts and prayers are with her family, friend and loved ones at this time and I do hope, that if it is indeed Nicola, they can find some peace with this. If is not, I would send my prayers to the family off whomsoever it may be. I would add as a final note, I will not be giving any further information or commentary at this time regarding the work involved in finding this person nor is it my place to engage in any discussion on how that body came to originally be in the water.
Since I don’t have further facts I can share, only strong supposition from research I’ve carried out as to what’s taken place, I’ll not detail it here. Only to say, if my supposition is correct it’s one of the most intriguing aspects of the whole charade. To not be misunderstood I’m not taking cheap shots at spirituality, as a matter of fact I’d describe myself as a spiritual person. There’s another explanation that could manifest itself as Jason Rothwell’s strong belief in “channeling spirits”, but you’ll have to apply some lateral thinking on this for yourselves. A three minute video post shared from his social media account, uploaded March 20th. I suggest all is not as it seems:
Jason Rothwell photograph's eyes Mar 20th
FACT SEVEN: the following afternoon, Monday Feb-20th, the senior coroner Dr James Adeley confirms at a four-minute hearing the positive identification of Nicola via dental records and adjourned the inquest to June for “further evaluation” requiring Home Office pathologist. No cause of death is released.
There are many plausible, speculative theories circulating about how Nicola’s body ended up concealed in the reeds at the location from which it was recovered. There is a convenient layby along the quiet country road, perfect for someone to stop in the dead of night to dump her body. Once again there is a large caravan site in proximity, as well as a nearby culvert where it’s possible her body could have been stored for many days without being discovered. However there’s no mileage in exploring any of these as none of this can be proven by way of facts, resting on speculation alone. We don’t know how her body got there IF it was indeed her body at all?
What did those recovering her body find so amusing if it was indeed a real body as opposed to a prop for a theatrical performance?
Question: who are these men? Are they genuine regular police officers or are they possibly phony actors in on the charade?
This has to be considered a real possibility since there’s no information on the chain of custody – who collected the body from the crime scene, who handled it, analysed and transferred the body, and where it was stored. A lot can happen within 24 hours before the senior coroner had the chance of examination the following afternoon at 2.15pm. I admit I’m leaning toward the possibility of a prop later being switched with Nicola’s body if for no other reason, the manner in which it was dragged up the bank beggars belief. If it was her lifeless body, the manner in which it was being hoisted out by two individuals showed a staggering lack of due process, care and respect. There has to also be doubt as while Nicola might weigh but fifty kilograms that’s a considerable dead weight to pull up the steep bank.
This has strayed into the HOW it has all been carried out which was not my intention to go into, but that’s a sufficiently important aspect for consideration.
FACT EIGHT: time travel isn’t real, at least not in the conventional sense that we all understand. Let me explain.
First I must introduce another controlled opposition character of this saga. Each has a unique and distinct persona that he or she works hard on, and in the case of Curtis Arnold of Curtis Media (Youtuber with twelve thousand subscribers), like marmite you either love him or hate him. This is intentional. He projects himself as the people’s champion providing extensive on location live footage, supposedly hunting for the truth of what has happened (but he isn’t). Always calm and respectful, easy to watch, however his speciality is to corral his audience into narrative no.2, foul play by unknown local persons close to Nicola, a whodunnit? If you believe him to be genuine take note of the saying:
“Whenever the people need a hero we shall supply him”
His YouTube account was set up two days before Nicola’s disappearance and the melodrama around his persecution by the mainstream media, how the police have allegedly harassed him and the apology he had to make to Nicola’s family for causing them distress with some of his filming is all distraction and part of the theatre. Ignore it.
In addition to Chris Neill’s photos it was Curtis who was sure to leak video footage of Jason Rothwell - so as to leave nothing to chance for gormless journalists to subsequently find him, leading to the inevitable stories to beguile you with.
The article below from a regional paper confirms how he deleted certain videos including the one of him filming activity - not covertly as mainstream media complicit try to have their audience believe - but from the other side of the river in full view. This is part and parcel of the storyline, but all merely propaganda to misdirect people. Sky News also put out video which for intents and purposes has been erased from the internet. Put to one side decency in a genuine tragedy, it was a requirement for audiences to see live footage ‘proving’ a body was being recovered to reinforce the charade now reaching its climax. Remember it may not of been her body, we can’t know for sure. The most revealing part of his video however was what he inadvertently said:
Curtis Arnold: “When I arrived in St Michael's that day, about 11 o’clock, me and the mainstream media were talking and we could see the helicopter hovering, so we all headed over the field. They had to collect all their big camera stuff so I got there first.”
Worcester News: Curtis Media apology
What a remarkable coincidence! No-one had anything better to do on a quiet Sunday morning but gather thirty-six minutes before a psychic who just happened to be on a scouting trip some way downstream before placing a phone call to the police. Certainly Chris Neill the photographer, among the very first few support actors to the scene, wasn’t among this merry bunch as in his own words: “Just sheer luck, I was heading to Fleetwood driving alongside the River Wyre”. Try harder, be better. It’s insulting to our intelligence.
CENSORSHIP
Before concluding I’d like to share something I learned about how censorship works in practice, about how the media can be directed in ways unseen never to report on much that should be revealed if they’d an ounce of journalistic integrity between them. There are a range of issues that are too hot to handle where an unspoken blanket ban is envoked. The truth behind Nicola Bulley’s murder is one of these issues.
First a metaphor for you. Let’s play a game:
Imaginary situation: you arrive at Bolinas beach (California) for the first time with your surfboard ready to ride some waves.
You have access to only four channels, each with an advisor from which to receive sage advice before diving into the sea.
(i) Ch.1 advisor - don’t under any circumstance go further than 100m out. Dangerous currents which will drag you out. Stay safe, look for the red buoy and keep this side of it.
(ii) Ch.2 advisor - don’t listen to Ch.1, that’s misinformation. The waters are fine in this area, as you can tell from looking at beyond the waves. Enjoy your surf, it’s fine.
(iii) Ch.3 advisor - it’s a lovely day for a surf. Enjoy.
(iv) Ch.4 advisor - is uncontactable, out of service, the network is unavailable for some reason.
Question: what do you make of each of the above and what do you do? Please read no further and ponder the imaginary scenario for a few moments first.
Before I return to the point of the Bolinas beach scenario I’ll explain the real life example of censorship that I learned much from. One of the heroes from the last few years is Dr Mike Yeadon. I recall his recounting the story of himself and a fellow committed group of doctors (standing for truth and ethics in science) using a professional, commercial newswire service to reach four thousand news stations internationally to gain exposure for their detailed open letter submitted to European Medicines Agency Feb-28th 2021. All but only two blanked them. The only two that didn’t ignore it were The Highwire and Children’s Health Defence, demonstrating that virtually all media outlets had conspired to keep it a lid on it. It’s a certainty that if people had sight of this letter and many other associated censored materials at the time, a large number of people would have made different choices off the back of relevant information to inform decision making.
Back to Bolinas beach (California)
The answer is if you’d gone out to surf that day you’d have been torn to shreds by the unusually large number of great white sharks in the area. As an aside, there were dangerous currents 100m from shore. Summary of the channel advisors:
(i) Ch.1 : the most skilled controlled opposition. They tell you the truth, focus all your attention on some aspect, but divert you away from what’s really important.
(ii) Ch.2 : run-of-the-mill controlled opposition who suck people in with well-packaged lies in contradiction, but also have the winning effect of herding some back to the duplicitous tactics of Ch.1. Either way, you lose, they’re both deceptive.
(iii) Ch.3 : the majority of people that don’t know what time of day it is, not capable of independent thought, reliant on repeating what they are programmed to believe.
(iv) Ch.4 : ruthlessly sabotaged and censored, the minority of humanity that champions integrity and honesty. The advisor - if the message were allowed to get through - would have warned not to go into the water that day because of the sharks.
There’s a message in there somewhere. I hope it helps with perceiving the greatest threat that is pervasive: insincere talking heads that pollute all communication channels.
CONCLUSION
As with the bogus investigation there are few hard-and-fast facts surrounding the day of discovery of Nicola’s supposed body. What’s clear is that there was nothing authentic about the day’s events and there were actors in and amongst genuine police officers performing their duties, such as putting in place roadblocks for example.
There is no current mechanism for Nicola Bulley to receive justice for her murder. The College of Policing investigation review is a cover up for the complicity of Lancashire Constabulary’s role and they are assisted in this by HM Senior Coroner - Dr James Adeley - who has requested the police not to discuss the case in either social media or the mainstream media whilst “considering the information”. Really? Both will shortly receive a copy of this account I’ve provided, for which any rebuttal of the facts outlined is positively welcome. However I expect the proverb ‘Silence is golden’ will rule the day.
The full day inquest hearing is scheduled to take place 10am on Jun-26th at County Hall, Preston PR1 8XJ. Dr James Adeley and the Coroner’s offices can be contacted on email: coroners@lancashire.gov.uk. The purpose of the hearing is to answer the fundamental questions of where and when the death occurred, as well as how the death has occurred. It’s my bet this is pre-determined to result in an open verdict.
It only remains for me to state that what we’re left with are all the hallmarks of British intelligence pulling the operational strings. The extent to which British spies can commit crimes remains confidential, essentially outside the scope of the law.
The Guardian: authorised criminality
Someone, somewhere is likely getting a dressing down for what has been shambolic start to finish. Whie their US Intelligence Community friends can play a coordinating role in the assassination of a sitting US president and make three towers disintegrate, our hapless lot have made themselves look a motley crew in the disappearance and murder of just the one woman.
Thank you for taking the time to read. If Nicola Bulley isn’t to be just another statistic and yesterday’s news, then please do share. It’s only by a concerted effort by members of the public that sufficient pressure can be exerted to enact a proper review.
Ask yourself one final question. I’m fully transparent and open to address at length any intelligent rebuttal to everything I’ve documented. Why do you think it might be that not a single media platform (big or small) will touch this with a bargepole? If you have an alternative explanation to the Establishment directly or indirectly controlling all the media when it comes to the most sensitive issues, I’m all ears. 2023 and it’s starting to look a lot like the Ministry of Truth has arrived. Happy to be proved wrong!